Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in 303 Creative LLC v Elenis. The case involves a Colorado web designer who stated she will not create wedding websites for same-sex couples when she expands her business, violating a Colorado anti-discrimination law. The issue is whether that anti-discrimination law infringes on the web designer’s religious beliefs. It’s a fascinating case that fosters nuanced discussion, as evidenced by today’s link from conservative Walter Olson.

As one might expect given Olson’s political leanings, he supports the web designer’s position. What one might not expect is Olson also supported the Obergefell decision, which essentially legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. On the surface, his views might seem contradictory, but only on the surface. He doesn’t oppose Colorado’s law on religious grounds — he opposes its suppression of religious liberties. Just as he opposed other states’ suppression of marriage. Viewed through the lens of freedom, it’s a remarkably consistent position. And while that doesn’t mean one has to agree with it, it is deserving of respect. It’s a principled stand that leaves more room for thought than anger. In such politically fraught times, these are the kinds of arguments we should be reading — not the ad hominem attacks — to help us see the best of the other side.